The Mercy Court
The Mercy Court
Your pathway to divine reasoning
Reasons to Believe · Chapter 1 · More Than a Feeling

Brief

Chapter Summary

In the opening chapter of Reasons to Believe, Scott Hahn challenges the contemporary assumption that religious faith is a subjective, emotional “leap in the dark.” Drawing from his personal intellectual journey—specifically a college-era challenge regarding the biblical basis for infant baptism—Hahn illustrates that genuine faith is a reasonable and intellectually grounded response to objective truth.

Core Thesis Statement

Faith is not an irrational leap or a mere emotional experience; it is a reasonable, intellectually honest response to truth that harmonizes the heart and the mind.

Key Arguments

  1. The Instability of Emotion: Feelings and “spiritual highs” are temporary and fluctuate; therefore, they constitute a weak foundation for a lifelong commitment to truth.
  2. The Biblical Precedent for Infant Baptism: Using the continuity of God’s covenants, Hahn argues that just as infants were included in the Old Covenant through circumcision, they are included in the New Covenant through baptism.
  3. The Harmony of Faith and Reason: Reason helps individuals investigate truth, while faith allows them to trust truths that reason points toward but cannot fully grasp alone.
  4. The Knowability of Divine Mysteries: Although the mysteries of Christianity are unfathomable, they are not unknowable, as God has willed to disclose them through Scripture and creation.
  5. The Intellectual Necessity of Dogma: When officially defined teachings are dismissed in favor of generalized emotion, religion eventually loses its force and collapses.
  6. The Nature of True Apologetics: Effective defense of the faith requires deep preparation, prayer, and humility rather than “snappy answers.”
  7. The Universality of Truth: Following St. Justin Martyr’s principle, Christians can engage with any philosophy or science because “whatever is true is ours.”

Key Vocabulary

TermDefinition
ApologeticsThe theological art of explaining and defending the Christian faith using reason, logic, history, and Scripture (from the Greek apologia, meaning a formal defense).
DogmaOfficially defined teachings of the Church held as divinely revealed truths; definitive doctrine rather than opinion.
MystagogyGuidance into the mysteries of faith; leading a person deeper into truths they have already received.
FideismThe erroneous belief that one should rely on faith alone without any engagement of reason.
Objective TruthTruth that exists independently of personal opinion, feeling, or subjective experience.
TranscendenceThe reality or existence of something beyond the material world.

Scripture References and Apologetics Functions

Scripture & ReferenceContent / ContextApologetics Function
1 Peter 3:15“Always be ready to give a logical defense, yet do it with gentleness and respect.”The foundational mandate for apologetics; emphasizes a reasoned, humble defense rather than argument for its own sake.
Matthew 19:14“Let the children come to me, for the Kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”Used to demonstrate that children are rightful members of the Kingdom, providing a basis for infant baptism.
Matthew 28:18–19“Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them.”Establishes baptism as an authoritative directive and command from Christ, not a feeling-based preference.
Acts 2:38–39“The promise was made to you and your children.”Explicit biblical evidence that the promise of baptism and the Holy Spirit extends to the next generation, mirroring Old Covenant inclusion.
Romans 1:16“For I am not ashamed of the gospel.”The apologetics imperative to own the gifts of the faith, like dogma, even when they are caricatured by the culture.
← Back to the chapter Mercy, by verdict.